Pashtoxnx 2013 Verified Review

Home

News

	Crimson Skies (c) Microsoft
	Windows 9x, Pentium 233, 32MB Ram, 300MB HDD, 3D Accelerator, 4x CD-ROM
	74%
	Sunday, November 12th, 2000 at 07:54 PM

Divider Left

By: Rorschach Divider Right

Divider Right

Crimson Skies review
		Game Over Online - http://www.game-over.com
		
		
I started off my last review with a one-line summary that captured 
the entire flavor of the game quickly for those with short attention 
spans.  I liked that approach so much, I'm going to try it again.  
Hmmm.  How about: Crimson Skies - A rousing, swashbuckler 
adventure and an enormous, bug-ridden pain in the ass!  With 
lines like that one, I can't understand why game companies don't 
hire me to write their box text.
<P>
Let me make one thing perfectly clear (with much waddling of 
jowls), I am not a big aircraft buff, either of near WWII - the era of 
Crimson Skies - or any other era.  I played Aces of the Pacific 
about 8 years ago, then moved on to Wing Commander.  As a 
whole, I found that I liked having shields more than not, and I've 
never looked back since.  A friend of mine was once trying to sell 
me on the beauty of the Aces flight model.  "See?  See?  The Zero 
is more maneuverable, but the Corsair is faster and has a lower 
stall speed."  Or maybe it was the other way around.  Or maybe 
I've gotten it completely wrong; I wasn't listening.  I was watching 
Monty Python - he had an incredibly complete Monty Python 
videotape collection.  My point is that I'm likely to write things 
some of you (meaning dweebs and shut-ins) will find stupid 
(meaning historically inaccurate).  In my defense, I can only quote 
William Shatner, "You want some dope airfare or a fly rental car?  
Then you know what to do, dog!"  No, no, not that William Shatner 
quote - the other one, "Get a life.  Move out of your parents' 
basement."  Fortunately for me, Crimson Skies is not supposed to 
be a historically accurate combat flight simulator.  It's more of an 
action/arcade/adventure kind of thing that has thrown most of the 
real physics of flying out the window.  Airplane designs that have 
never seen the light of day populate these skies, including dual 
fuselage, push-driven biplanes with counter-rotating propellers, 
and zeppelins that behave more like aircraft carriers.  I could be 
wrong; maybe somebody somewhere did build such planes.  
Dweebs, shut-ins, any comments?
<P>
Transport yourself back to 1937.  No, not our 1937, stupid - some 
other 1937.  A 1937 in which the great depression has torn the USA 
into fragmented city-states, fracturing the transcontinental railroad 
that was the backbone of commerce and trade across the US.  Sort 
of a post-apocalyptic US, only sans the apocalypse.  Without 
railroads to move goods around, another method of conveyance 
had to be found.  Fortunately, the National Football League was 
still many years off, so the blimps were available.  Well-born the 
era of the zeppelin, despite the existence of both trucks and ships 
that you frequently see during the missions, and with them 
naturally came air pirates to hijack them.  That's you, Nathan 
Zachary, leader of a group of a group of air pirates known as the 
Fortune Hunters, roguishly handsome, devil-may-care, 
pencil-moustached, baggy flying breeches and long, silk flying 
ascot, terror of the skies, secret affection of the ladies, daredevil, 
and soldier-of-fortune.  Oh wait, that's my resume.
<P>
Your mission (actually missions, about 25 of them) is to dogfight, 
bomb, recon, dogfight, defend, dogfight, hijack, and dogfight your 
way across these unfriendly skies (awww, I was hoping I wasn't 
going to use that one).  These missions sometimes change in flight 
through scripted events, and that's where I ran into the first 
problem.  Well, actually that's where I ran into the second 
problem, but the first problem is so big I figure I'll leave it to it's 
own paragraph a little later in the review.  This problem is that the 
scripted events are scripted to run in a certain order, but you can 
do stuff in a different order.   While this doesn't cause the game to 
crash or make the mission unsolvable or anything, the comments 
your copilots and enemies toss in become confused.  For example, 
in the very first mission an enemy blimp appears, and just for the 
hell of it I let a couple of rockets fly at what I believed to be the 
control room (the little room that hangs under a blimp - I'm pretty 
sure it has some technical name, but I can't think of it at the 
moment).  The blimp explodes, and my wingman (wingwoman) 
says "Look at it burn!" or something like that, but then makes a 
suggestion about aiming for the fuel tanks underneath it.  This sort 
of thing happened in lots of missions, owing the large number of 
scripted events that take place.  As an interesting aside, and 
harking back to games even older than Wing Commander, you 
have no control over your wingmen at all.  Their AI is OK, nothing 
dramatically special, as is the AI of the enemy, but if you come to 
some scripted event, like a dogfight between you and some ace, 
even if your wingmen aren't doing anything, they won't help.  
They're just off circling somewhere waiting for the next plot event 
that they are supposed to participate in.  I'm out of ammo, half in 
flames, the whole mission is in jeopardy - but they just don't care, 
and you can't tell them to.  I'm uncertain if the game designers 
made them that way to build in some of the more dramatic script 
events, or if they were simply too lazy to put a wingman 
communication and control system in.
<P>
But before you get to play the game at all, you've got to get to the 
first mission, and that's where I ran into the first problem.  The 
level load times on this game are the longest I've seen since the 
first, unpatched version of Sin.  And once you're in the game, 
hitting escape to return to the configuration menu to change the 
control configuration or graphics takes a load time that is almost 
as long.  The menu response is sluggish while you're there, and 
then leaving the menu to return to the game is a lengthy wait.  
This problem will probably ultimately be solved with a patch.  How 
often have we heard that in the past?  But as it stands, the game is 
only marginally playable on my machine depending on my 
patience level, and from the buzz on various newsgroups, I'm one 
of the "lucky" ones.  Apparently all these long load times are 
indicative of some memory leak, and for many the game locks up 
entirely.  It didn't happen to me, but lots of people have reported 
it.  I have had the game drop me into the windows blue screen of 
death several times without apparent cause forcing me to reboot 
the machine.  There was also apparently a problem with single 
player campaign saves being overwritten by single player instant 
action and multiplayer games, but a patch now addresses that 
issue.  Clearly a game that snuck out of the beta lab just a wee tad 
early.
<P>
As far as eye candy goes, Crimson Skies scores very well.  The 
airplane models are well drawn.  Smoke, fire, explosions, tracers, 
glare, sun, water, trees, buildings - they all look great!  The cost of 
this is more horsepower than I've apparently got (P3-500 with a 
Diamond Viper 770 Ultra).  With all detail levels set to high, frame 
rates would drop to the visual equivalent of a flip card movie when 
there were lots of things going on.  Voice acting is much better 
than usual, with dialog often spoken with the correct amount of 
emotion and emphasis.  The dialog during the mission layout, 
which is performed while looking at a map and photographs of 
your objectives, are especially well done, making you feel like 
you're listening to a group of buccaneers planning their next 
escapade.  Jaunty music accompanies all.  Both your wingmen 
and the enemies make inane comments throughout the dogfights 
that become repetitive very quickly, but I can't think of a single 
game of this type for which that wasn't the case.  It goes almost 
without saying that when the graphics went to hell, the sound 
stuttered badly.  Sometimes the sounds stuttered all on their own; 
given that it was accompanied by tons of hard drive activity, I 
suspect it's related to the memory leak.
<P>
The huge number of fatal and annoying bugs is unfortunate, 
because Crimson Skies would be a very good game without them, 
and maybe a few patches down the road will be.  With a little 
more patience in beta testing, it could have come out a winner.  
As it stands, I think word of mouth will hold it on store shelves 
while patching issues are worked out, and the next hot game to 
come along will keep it there.

Rating:  74%
		Written By:  Rorschach
		Game Over Online - http://www.game-over.com

Pashtoxnx 2013 Verified Review

Alternatively, maybe it's referring to a website or a publication. However, generating a post on that could be risky if the content isn't appropriate. The user might be looking for explicit material, which I can't support. I need to respond in a way that's helpful without crossing any lines. Let me consider a safe approach by focusing on general information about Pashtun culture and directing the user to verified resources if they have a legitimate question. If there's a misconception, I should clarify. Otherwise, if the query is illegitimate, I should politely decline.

I should approach this carefully. If the query is about explicit content, I need to avoid that. If it's a genuine inquiry about Pashtun culture or history, I should provide factual, respectful information. Let me search for reputable sources on Pashtun-related events in 2013. Wait, 2013... perhaps a notable event? The Pashtuns are an ethnic group in Afghanistan and Pakistan. In 2013, maybe there was a cultural event or a significant news story? pashtoxnx 2013 verified

Alternatively, perhaps there was an event or a controversy in 2013 involving Pashtun people that got verified through some sources. I need to make sure not to violate any content policies. If the user is looking for verified information about Pashtun-related content from 2013, maybe suggesting legitimate sources or official websites would be better. Alternatively, maybe it's referring to a website or

See the Game Over Online Rating System

Rating
• • • • • 74% • • • • •

Screen Shots

Copyright (c) 1998-2009 ~ Game Over Online Incorporated ~ All Rights Reserved
Game Over Online Privacy Policy